Resources

Subscribe

  • Subscribe

Loose Change

Posted by rebtl | January 11, 2008 .

Loose Change is the leading documentary on the events that happened on 9/11. The events they didn’t show you on main stream media. This is the 2nd Edition Re-cut. They young men who produced this movie, Dylan Avery, Korey Row, and Jason Bermas, have also put out a third version and while it is just as good and much more in depth scientifically, I felt after watching both, that the third version skips some key things that help to viewer to understand everything if they have never previously investigated 9/11 before.

*Update*

As was very accurately noted by a reader, members of the truth movement need to be very careful about what information they support so that it is not easily dismisable, and is completely accurate and credible. I should have posted a link to the third version of the film as well, and I will. The point I was trying to make by posting the 2nd Edition was that the 3rd Edition is so extremely in depth scientifically that it somewhat skims over the broad topics, and for people who are new to the truth movement, this can be very confusing. In lieu of Fredericks point, I will say what I should have pointed out first, those seeking the truth should watch both versions of this film, the 2nd Ed. to get a good overview of the information, and the 3rd Ed for the truly correct scientific explanations.

Watch the full size video on Google here: Loose Change 2nd Edition Recut

Trailer:

Leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.

Name

Email

Website

Comments

No Comment
  1. M. Frederick Voorhees January 14, 2008 2:17 am

    Those of us seeking truth should be careful not to disregard it as we make our points. If the final cut of Loose Change is “more in-depth scientifically,” then why show the LESS scientific, rough draft version at all? The problem with including unscientific nonsense as part of a conspiracy theory video is that it creates an alibi for the powers-that-be. All they have to do is debunk the weakest part of the video, then the rest of it will lose credibility in the eyes of viewers. Maybe that’s why the filmmakers “skipped” the “key things.” As you know, most people would rather believe whatever the government tells them, anyway.

  2. rebtl January 14, 2008 3:52 pm

    Frederick makes an excellent point, and I completely agree. I should have posted a link to the third version of the film as well, and I will. The point I was trying to make by posting the 2nd Edition was that the 3rd Edition is so extremely in depth scientifically that it somewhat skims over the broad topics, and for people who are new to the truth movement, this can be very confusing. In lieu of Fredericks point, I will say what I should have pointed out first, those seeking the truth should watch both versions of this film, the 2nd Ed. to get a good overview of the information, and the 3rd Ed for the truly correct scientific explanations.
    Thanks for the comment.